Wednesday, November 16, 2005

Can We Terminate Him Already?



On October 7, 2005, our Governator signed SB 861, which is a breed-specific law, targeting pitbulls in California. (Gavin Newsom, one of my S.F. heroes supported this -- how could you?) Details are here.

Ok, so this is not an all-out ban like in Ontario, Canada, but it's a toe-hold. I think it's a good idea to spay and neuter dogs, and we always do, but to FORCE owners with a specific breed to do so is discriminatory. Also, if you read the law, it's a little vague. It basically states that if you own a pitbull -- or a breed that looks like a pitbull -- this law applies to your dog.

Also, these breed-specific laws are the first step to stronger restrictions. Try getting homeowners insurance if you own a pitbull. It's nearly impossible in California. We are punishing an entire breed for being the choice of bad dog owners. It is a small step from SB 861 to a total ban, and that's not paranoia, it's history.

This one, I can't blame 100% on the Governator, because ignorance about this breed spreads far and wide. It's just unfortunate that our law-makers have caught the bug. Maybe I'll start tapping into the demographic that people really listen to -- celebrities. I have a camera, a microphone and some webspace. Maybe it's time for some PSA's.

1 Comments:

At 3:46 PM, Blogger Keri said...

You're right - it's a bias against pit bulls that is far and wide. That makes it an "easy" issue for politicians to sign onto and make like they are doing something about something - if a law supports a widely held bias then most politicians won't give it a second thought.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home